For the past hundreds of years, humans have been led in the wrong direction. And Scientists are to blame. Although they have been the guidance that society needs, and have led them to many discoveries, scientists have locked humans up in a dark, unescapable cage, just like the animals that scientists have been using for years. Scientists are using animal experimentation to invent cures for human diseases. But is it worth it? No. Animal experimentation is unnecessary because human death rates are still increasing and animals are unlike humans. After so many years of animal testing, human death rates are increasing rather than decreasing. By now, the death rates should be lowering if the method was working. Scientists are wasting time using animals according to the “cancer rates that are 14 percent higher and cancer deaths that are 5 percent higher today than when the “war on cancer” began in 1973″ (“How to Debate”). Scientists can’t continue using this experimenting method if families are going to be losing family members to this “war on cancer.” Scientists can’t expect victims to continue to want to fight for so long. Even other methods are doing a way better job at helping patients, according to Medical historians who say that, “improved nutrition, sanitation… not anything learned from animal experiments, are responsible for the decline in deaths since 1900” (“How to Debate”). With the fact that animal experimentation hasn’t been helpful, scientists should change their experimenting methods. They could help cure diseases in better ways that have benefited humans. Along with fact that animal experimentation is powerless when it comes to helping out, animals aren’t even like humans. And though it is quite obvious, it isn’t clear to scientists because they keep using animals as the center of their experiments. It isn’t working well and when scientists have a major breakthrough, they take a decade or more to develop the product. Even though ” 150 years of animal “models” have produced 25 drugs “proven” effective against stroke,” (“How to Debate”) none of them worked in humans. There were too many poor animals that had to be tested on during that period of time. Do scientists never feel sympathy for them? Scientists even take risks when they do animal experiments because “tests on animals can’t measure headache, nausea, tinnitus… all potentially dangerous to humans” (“How to Debate”).Basically, a human could become hospitalized from the unknown side effects of the medicine, because someone has to try it. Scientists shouldn’t continue to do these experiments if instead of helping, they are hurting humans. And of course, others may argue that “animal experiments have played a critical role in just about every medical breakthrough of the last century” (“Alas”). But, it’s taken scientists too long to reach these discoveries. They need a faster process for inventing new cures that will benefit them. And “animal experiments often lead down blind alleys and impede progress. Experiments on monkeys led to a misunderstanding of the mechanism of polio infection, which delayed development of a vaccine” (How to Debate). Scientists never know the outcome, or how long until they’ll stumble upon a medicine that truly works. Experiments need to change soon. Or else, scientists will continue putting others in great danger. Animal experimentation hasn’t been as helpful as humans need it to be. Scientists should be using a method that speeds the process of discoveries and lessens the harming of animals. Scientists kill thousands of animals just to create medicines that don’t benefit humans in any way. They need a method that even decreases death rates. If they used a method that decreased death rates, maybe they wouldn’t need to spend so much time on finding cures. They would be able to focus on other experiment subjects. The U.S. government should put a stop to this cruel way of finding discoveries. Animal experimentation needs to take humans’ place and be put into the dark, unescapable cage, and never be let out.